Who this page is for
Executors
You are the executor of a will that has been challenged — by a disappointed family member, an excluded beneficiary, or someone alleging fraud, undue influence, or incapacity. You need to understand your duty to defend the will, how to protect yourself from personal liability, and what evidence will carry most weight.
Beneficiaries Under a Challenged Will
You stand to benefit from a will that is under attack. Your inheritance depends on the will being upheld. You may need to participate in the proceedings — either alongside the executor or, in some cases, independently — to protect your interests.
Family Members Supporting the Will
You believe the challenged will reflects the will-maker's true intentions. You saw the will-maker when the will was made, or you had conversations with them about their wishes. Your evidence may be critical to the defence.
Professionals Involved in the Will-Making
Solicitors, accountants, financial advisers, or medical practitioners who were involved in the will-making process and whose records and testimony may be essential to establishing the validity of the will.
When a valid will comes under attack
A will may be challenged even where there is no substantive basis for the challenge. Family members who are disappointed with their inheritance, who feel excluded, or who hold long-standing grievances may bring proceedings without strong evidence. Others may genuinely believe — but be unable to prove — that something improper occurred.
As the person defending the will, your role is to establish, on the balance of probabilities, that the will is valid and should be admitted to probate. This means demonstrating that:
- The will-maker had testamentary capacity — they met the Banks v Goodfellow test at the time of execution
- The will-maker knew and approved the contents of the will — they understood what they were signing
- The will-maker acted free from undue influence — no one coerced or overbore their will
- The will was properly executed — it was in writing, signed by the will-maker, and witnessed by two people present at the same time
The grounds of challenge you may face include:
Allegation of Lack of Testamentary Capacity
The challenger alleges the will-maker did not meet the Banks v Goodfellow test at the time of execution — they did not understand the nature of making a will, the extent of their assets, the people who might expect to benefit, or the effect of the dispositions. This is the most common ground of challenge. The propounder of the will bears the onus of proving capacity where the will is rational on its face.
Allegation of Undue Influence
The challenger alleges the will-maker was coerced — their free will was overborne. This is one of the hardest grounds to prove, but also one of the most damaging if established. The challenger bears the onus and must meet the Briginshaw standard: clear, cogent, and precise evidence commensurate with the seriousness of the allegation.
Allegation of Want of Knowledge and Approval
The challenger alleges the will-maker did not truly understand and approve the contents of the will — even if they had capacity and were not coerced. This often arises where the will was prepared by a major beneficiary, where the will-maker had communication difficulties, or where the will is complex and the will-maker was not independently advised. Where suspicious circumstances are established, the evidential burden shifts to the propounder to prove knowledge and approval.
Allegation of Fraud or Forgery
The challenger alleges the will is not genuine — that the signature is forged, or that the document has been altered after execution. This is a serious allegation requiring clear evidence. Forensic document examination may be necessary. A successful allegation of forgery may also attract criminal consequences.
Allegation of Improper Execution
The challenger alleges the formal requirements for a valid will were not met — the will was not in writing, not signed by the will-maker, or not witnessed by two people present at the same time. In both NSW and QLD, the court has a dispensing power to admit an informally executed document if satisfied it was intended to form the will-maker's will.
Family Provision Claim
Strictly, a family provision claim does not challenge the validity of the will — it accepts the will is valid but seeks provision (or further provision) for an eligible applicant. However, family provision claims often accompany validity challenges and the two must be managed together strategically.
Evidence that strengthens a defence
The strength of a defence depends heavily on the quality and availability of contemporaneous evidence — records created at the time the will was made, not recollections reconstructed years later. The following categories of evidence are particularly valuable in rebutting challenges:
1. The Drafting Solicitor's File
The complete file of the solicitor who prepared the will is often the single most important piece of evidence. Look for: attendance notes showing the testator's presentation, understanding, and instructions; file notes recording that the testator was seen alone and appeared to act freely; correspondence confirming instructions; and any notes about the testator's explanation for their decisions. A solicitor who followed the "Golden Rule" — obtaining a medical assessment where capacity might be in question — will have created a strong evidentiary record. Request the file immediately — do not delay. Solicitor files can be destroyed after the retention period expires.
2. Capacity Evidence — Medical & Lay
Medical records from the period surrounding the will's execution: GP notes, specialist reports, cognitive assessments (MMSE, ACE-III, neuropsychological reports), hospital discharge summaries, and aged care assessments. Lay evidence from family members, friends, carers, and others who interacted with the testator around the relevant time can corroborate their mental state. Even where no formal capacity assessment was conducted, evidence of the testator's day-to-day functioning — managing finances, holding conversations, making decisions — is relevant.
3. Witness Records & Statements
The witnesses to the will's execution can give evidence about the circumstances of signing: whether the testator appeared to understand what they were doing, whether they appeared to be acting voluntarily, and whether any third party was present or exerting influence. Witnesses should be identified early and, where possible, asked to prepare detailed statements while their memory is fresh. The attestation clause itself — the statement that the will was signed by the testator in the presence of two witnesses — is evidence, though not conclusive.
4. Pattern of Consistent Testamentary Intentions
Earlier wills that reflect a consistent pattern of estate planning over many years support the inference that the challenged will represents the testator's genuine, long-held intentions. A radical departure from earlier wills is not fatal — people are entitled to change their minds — but a consistent pattern is helpful in rebutting suggestions of coercion or incapacity. Also relevant: statements the testator made to family and friends over time about their testamentary wishes, particularly where those statements are documented (letters, emails, diary entries).
5. Independent Statements & Correspondence
Letters, emails, and other communications in which the testator expressed their wishes independently of the challenged beneficiary. Statements from independent third parties — accountants, financial advisers, long-standing medical practitioners, friends without a financial interest in the estate — who discussed the testator's estate planning with them can provide powerful corroboration. Independence is key: evidence from disinterested witnesses carries more weight than evidence from beneficiaries.
6. The Presumption of Validity
A will that appears regular on its face — properly executed, with an attestation clause — is presumed to be valid. The party challenging the will bears the onus of proving their allegations. This is not a complete defence, but it means the challenger must produce evidence to shift the evidential burden. Where the challenge is weak, speculative, or based only on suspicion, this presumption may be decisive. However, where suspicious circumstances are shown, the evidential burden may shift back to the propounder of the will.
⚠ Executors: your personal duty to defend a valid will
An executor has a duty to uphold the valid will of the deceased. Where a challenge is made, the executor must take a position — generally, either defending the will or submitting to the court's judgment. An executor who fails to defend a valid will, or who compromises the estate's position without proper basis, may be personally liable for costs or for losses suffered by the estate. If you are an executor facing a challenge, obtain independent legal advice promptly. You may also apply to the court for judicial advice — an order from the court that you are justified in taking a particular course of action, which protects you from personal liability for costs. Executor defence advice →
Procedure — defending a will challenge step by step
The procedural path for defending a will challenge depends on whether probate has been granted and the nature of the challenge. The following is a general overview of how these matters typically progress:
- Identify the challenge early. A caveat may be lodged before probate, or proceedings may be commenced after a grant. In either case, early identification allows you to secure evidence and obtain legal advice before taking any irreversible steps. Check probate registries regularly if you anticipate a challenge.
- Preserve and gather evidence immediately. The drafting solicitor's file should be requested straight away. Medical records, earlier wills, witness details, and relevant correspondence should be collated. Do not discard or alter any documents — the duty of disclosure in probate litigation is stringent, and destruction of documents can lead to adverse inferences or costs orders.
- Assess the strength of the challenge candidly. Not every challenge has merit, but not every challenge can be dismissed. An early, honest assessment of the challenger's evidence — and the strength of your own — is essential to deciding whether to defend, negotiate, or consider settlement. Overconfidence in a weak case, or capitulation in a strong one, both carry costs.
- Consider probate in solemn form. Where a challenge is anticipated, the executor can apply for probate in solemn form rather than common form. Solemn form requires a court hearing and notice to all interested parties, but it provides greater finality because it binds everyone who was given notice. It is more expensive and time-consuming, but it may prevent later litigation.
- Engage with the challenger (with legal advice). In many cases, early engagement can resolve the matter. A challenger who understands the strength of the evidence supporting the will may withdraw or agree to a negotiated outcome. Conversely, a challenger with strong evidence may prompt consideration of a commercial resolution. All communications about the dispute should be through your legal representative once proceedings are on foot or anticipated.
- File a defence and any cross-claim. If the matter proceeds to litigation, a formal defence must be filed addressing each allegation. In appropriate cases, a cross-claim may be made — for example, seeking an order that the challenger pay costs on an indemnity basis if the challenge is baseless or pursued vexatiously.
- Prepare for mediation or trial. Most probate disputes are resolved before trial, often at mediation. However, preparation for hearing should proceed on the assumption that the matter may go to trial — this includes preparing witness statements, obtaining expert evidence (medical, forensic document examination, or handwriting analysis) if needed, and briefing counsel experienced in succession law.
Costs — who pays to defend a will?
Costs are a central concern in defending a will challenge. The general principles are:
- Executor's indemnity: An executor who acts reasonably in defending a will is generally entitled to be indemnified from the estate for their legal costs — even if the defence is unsuccessful. However, this indemnity is not automatic. If the executor acts unreasonably — by defending a will that was clearly invalid, or by prolonging litigation without proper basis — they may be ordered to pay costs personally.
- Costs follow the event: The general rule in litigation is that the unsuccessful party pays the successful party's costs. If the challenger fails to prove their case, they may be ordered to pay the estate's costs of the defence. If the challenger succeeds, the estate may be ordered to pay their costs.
- The probate exception: Where the testator's own conduct or the circumstances surrounding the will caused the litigation — for example, where the testator's behaviour, ambiguity in the will, or failure to obtain a medical assessment triggered the challenge — the court may order that costs be paid from the estate rather than by either party personally. This is the "probate exception" to the usual costs rule and is available in both NSW and Queensland.
- Judicial advice on costs: An executor who is uncertain whether to defend can apply to the court for judicial advice — an order that the executor is justified in defending (or not defending) the proceedings. If the court approves the course of action, the executor is protected from personal liability for costs.
NSW vs QLD — Key differences in defending a will
Defending a will under NSW law
- Governing legislation: Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
- Formal validity: s 6 — the will must be in writing, signed by the testator, and witnessed by two people present at the same time. Where formal requirements are not strictly met, s 8 (dispensing power) allows the court to admit an informal document if satisfied the deceased intended it to form their will
- Probate in solemn form: Available where a challenge is anticipated. Provides greater finality as it binds all interested parties who were given notice of the proceedings
- Six-month probate expectation: Probate should generally be sought within six months of death. Delay may require explanation and can itself attract scrutiny
- Supreme Court Equity Division: The Probate List hears contested probate matters. Specialist judges with succession law expertise manage these cases
- Costs — the probate exception: Where the testator's conduct or the circumstances caused the litigation, costs may be ordered from the estate rather than against the unsuccessful party. This is a significant factor in NSW probate litigation
- Caveat procedure: Part 78 of the Supreme Court Rules — a caveat prevents probate being granted. As the person defending the will, you may need to warn the caveat (requiring the caveator to file an appearance and commence proceedings) or apply to have it removed
Defending a will under Queensland law
- Governing legislation: Succession Act 1981 (QLD)
- Strict execution requirements: s 10 — the testator's signature must be placed in a particular position relative to the attestation clause (s 10(2)). A will that does not comply may still be admitted under s 18 (dispensing power), but the irregularity may attract scrutiny
- s 18 dispensing power: Court may admit informal documents, but the proponent must prove the deceased intended the document to form their will. This is a higher threshold than the NSW equivalent in some respects
- The lost will presumption (s 24(2)): Where a later will was last traced to the testator's possession and cannot be found, it is presumed destroyed with the intention of revoking it. This may be relevant if you are defending an earlier will and the challenger alleges a later will existed
- Probate in solemn form: Available where a challenge is anticipated. The procedure is governed by the UCPR Chapter 15
- Notice of Intention to Oppose: The QLD equivalent of a NSW caveat. The executor defending the will may need to respond to a notice by filing material demonstrating the will's validity
- Supreme Court of Queensland: Hears probate matters. The court has a strong preference for mediation before trial in estate disputes
- Costs: Similar principles to NSW apply — costs generally follow the event, with a probate exception where the testator's conduct caused the litigation. QLD courts have broad discretion on costs
Common mistakes when defending a will
- Destroying or altering documents. Never discard drafts, notes, correspondence, or earlier wills. The duty of disclosure in probate litigation is rigorous, and destruction of documents can lead to adverse inferences — the court may assume the destroyed documents would have harmed your case. This applies even to documents you consider irrelevant.
- Communicating with the challenger without legal advice. Statements made in anger, frustration, or even in an attempt to explain can be used against you — as admissions, as evidence of motive, or as evidence of consciousness of a weakness in the will. All communications about the dispute should be channelled through your legal representative once proceedings are on foot or anticipated.
- Distributing the estate while a challenge is pending. If you distribute assets and the will is later set aside, you may be personally liable to restore the estate to its proper beneficiaries. Distribution should await resolution of the challenge or be undertaken only on legal advice with appropriate protections — such as obtaining releases or indemnities from the recipients.
- Assuming the challenge will fail because the will "looks fine." A will that appears regular on its face may still be vulnerable to a capacity challenge if the testator's medical history raises questions. A testator can appear perfectly lucid during a short solicitor appointment while suffering from cognitive impairment that affects their testamentary decision-making. Seek an honest assessment of the risks.
- Failing to secure the solicitor's file promptly. Solicitor files can be misplaced, destroyed after a retention period (typically 7 years from the date of the last action), or become unavailable. Request the file immediately — it may be the single most important piece of evidence in your defence.
- Assuming the costs of defence will always be covered by the estate. While executors are generally entitled to be indemnified, this is not automatic. An executor who acts unreasonably — by defending a clearly invalid will or by prolonging litigation — may be ordered to pay costs personally. Obtain legal advice on the merits early.
What to do immediately if a will you support is challenged
- Do not distribute any estate assets. If you are the executor and you have not yet distributed the estate, stop. Distribution during a challenge creates personal liability risk
- Contact the solicitor who drafted the will. Request the complete file — attendance notes, correspondence, earlier drafts, the execution copy with attestation clause. Do this before the file is destroyed under the solicitor's document retention policy
- Identify the witnesses. Locate the two people who witnessed the will's execution. Obtain their contact details. Consider asking them to write down their recollections while memory is fresh
- Gather medical records. If capacity is likely to be challenged, start gathering the testator's medical records from the period surrounding the will's execution — GP, specialists, hospital, aged care
- Collect earlier wills and estate planning documents. Locate all earlier wills, codicils, and estate planning documents. These show the pattern of the testator's intentions over time
- Get independent legal advice immediately. Before responding to the challenger, before filing anything in court, before taking any action that might affect the estate — speak to a specialist estate litigation lawyer
Defend the will — protect the estate and yourself
Whether you are an executor with a duty to uphold the will, or a beneficiary whose inheritance is under threat, early legal advice is essential. We can assess the strength of the challenge, identify and secure the evidence needed to defend it, advise on costs and funding options, and represent your interests through negotiation, mediation, or trial. Every day of delay makes the defence harder — evidence degrades, files are destroyed, and witnesses' memories fade.
Frequently asked questions
An executor who acts reasonably in defending a will is generally entitled to be indemnified from the estate for their costs — even if the defence is unsuccessful. However, this indemnity is not automatic. If the executor acts unreasonably — by defending a will that was clearly invalid, by prolonging litigation without proper basis, or by preferring one beneficiary's interests over another's — they may be ordered to pay costs personally. The key is to obtain independent legal advice early and to act on it. In appropriate cases, the executor may seek judicial advice from the court about whether to defend the proceedings. If the court approves the course of action, the executor is protected from personal liability.
Probate in solemn form is a grant of probate made after a court hearing in which the validity of the will has been determined. It is contrasted with probate in common form, which is granted administratively without a hearing. Solemn form probate provides greater finality because it binds all parties who were given notice of the proceedings — they cannot later challenge the will on grounds they raised or could have raised. It is appropriate where a challenge is anticipated or where there is a real dispute about validity. The process is more time-consuming and expensive, but it may avoid later litigation. An executor who is uncertain whether to seek solemn form probate should seek legal advice and may apply for judicial advice from the court.
Yes. Litigation is costly, uncertain, and emotionally draining — particularly estate litigation, which often divides families. An executor may properly consider settlement of a will challenge if it is in the best interests of the estate and the beneficiaries as a whole — even if the executor personally believes the will would be upheld at trial. The relevant question is not "is the will valid?" but "is the cost, delay, and risk of litigation justified by the likely outcome?" However, any settlement must be reasonable and must not prefer one beneficiary's interests over another's without justification. The executor should seek legal advice and, where appropriate, the court's approval before agreeing to a settlement. Beneficiaries whose interests would be affected by the settlement must generally be consulted.
The absence of the solicitor's file does not make the will indefensible, but it makes the defence significantly more difficult. In such cases, you must rely more heavily on other evidence: witnesses to the will's execution, medical records showing capacity, earlier wills demonstrating consistent intentions, correspondence, contemporaneous diary entries or letters, and lay evidence from people who discussed the will with the testator. The court will draw inferences from the available evidence. Where the file has been destroyed under a routine document retention policy, this is generally not held against the propounder — but the absence of the file may make it harder to discharge the burden of proof. This is why requesting the file immediately is so critical.
Yes, but you must be careful. An executor who is also a beneficiary has a conflict of interest: their duty as executor is to act impartially and in the best interests of the estate as a whole, while their interest as a beneficiary is to maximise their own inheritance. This conflict does not disqualify you from defending the will, but it means you must be seen to act properly. Key principles: obtain independent legal advice (not from the solicitor who drafted the will if you were involved in that process); consider whether an independent administrator should be appointed to avoid any appearance of bias; do not use estate funds to advance your personal position in the dispute without court approval; and be transparent with other beneficiaries about your actions and decisions. In some cases, it may be appropriate for you to step aside as executor and allow an independent person to defend the will on behalf of the estate.
Related services and resources
Challenging a Will
Understanding the grounds on which a will may be challenged helps you anticipate and rebut the allegations you may face. This page covers all grounds of challenge.
Executor Misconduct
If you are an executor facing allegations of misconduct, or a beneficiary concerned about the executor's conduct in defending the will, this page explains the relevant duties and remedies.
For Executors — Complete Guide
Comprehensive guidance for executors: duties, risks, common mistakes, and practical steps from first notification to final distribution.
Documents to Gather Checklist
Practical checklist of all documents relevant to defending a will — from the solicitor's file to medical records to correspondence.