National Crime 
The Queensland succession framework
Queensland estate and probate law operates under the Succession Act 1981 (QLD), a statute that has been described as preserving more of the older English statutory structure than its NSW counterpart. The Act is supplemented by the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (QLD) — Chapter 15 governing probate and administration — the Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (QLD), the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (QLD), and the common law as developed through the Supreme Court of Queensland.
The Supreme Court of Queensland exercises probate jurisdiction throughout the state. Grants of probate or letters of administration may be made by a registrar in common form (uncontested) or by a judge in solemn form (contested). The Public Trustee Act 1978 (QLD) also gives the Public Trustee certain functions in deceased estates, including acting as administrator where no other person is willing or able to do so.
Queensland's succession law contains several provisions that are unique or unusual in Australian probate jurisprudence. These provisions can be outcome-determinative in contested estate matters and are not always well understood even by practitioners from other jurisdictions.
Distinctive QLD succession provisions
s 10(2) — Positional Signature Rule
Under s 10(2) of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD), a will is not properly executed unless the testator's signature — or the signature of the person signing at the testator's direction — appears at the foot or end of the will. This positional requirement is stricter than in other Australian jurisdictions and can invalidate a will where the signature appears in an unusual place, unless the dispensing power under s 18 is successfully invoked.
s 18 — Dispensing Power
Section 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD) empowers the Court to admit to probate a document that does not comply with the formal requirements for execution of a will, if the Court is satisfied that the document expresses the testamentary intentions of the deceased. The dispensing power has been used to save wills with defective execution — including signature position problems under s 10(2) — but its application is discretionary and evidence-dependent.
s 24(2) — Lost Will Presumption
Where a will was last traced to the possession of the testator and cannot be found after death, s 24(2) of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD) creates a presumption that the testator destroyed the will with the intention of revoking it. This presumption can be rebutted by evidence — for example, that the testator lacked capacity at the relevant time, that the will was destroyed by another person, or that the testator's statements and conduct were consistent with the will remaining in force.
Criminal Code s 488 — Will Forgery
Under s 488 of the Criminal Code 1899 (QLD), a person who forges a will, codicil, or other testamentary instrument — or utters a document known to be forged — with intent to defraud is guilty of a crime and liable to imprisonment for 14 years. This is one of the most serious penalties for will-related fraud in Australia and reflects the gravity with which Queensland law views testamentary forgery.
Enduring powers of attorney and QCAT in Queensland
The Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (QLD) governs enduring powers of attorney in Queensland. An attorney under an enduring power of attorney has fiduciary obligations to act honestly and with reasonable diligence, to keep records, and to avoid conflicts of interest. When an attorney misuses their power — by transferring assets to themselves, depleting an elderly person's funds, or pressuring a donor to change their will — the consequences can be severe for both the donor's lifetime interests and the ultimate distribution of their estate.
QCAT (the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal) has jurisdiction to review the conduct of attorneys under enduring powers of attorney. QCAT can suspend or revoke an attorney's appointment, appoint a replacement, require the attorney to produce accounts, declare that a transaction was not authorised, and order the attorney to compensate the principal for loss. QCAT proceedings are generally less formal than Supreme Court proceedings and are an important first-line pathway for concerned family members.
The Public Guardian (Queensland) also has statutory functions in relation to adults with impaired capacity, including investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Where an attorney under an EPOA is suspected of misconduct, the Public Guardian may investigate and, if necessary, apply to QCAT for orders. The Public Guardian can be reached for concerns about financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.
Notice of Intention to Oppose a Grant
In Queensland, a person who wishes to oppose a grant of probate or letters of administration must file a Notice of Intention to Oppose with the Supreme Court registry. This is the QLD equivalent of a caveat (NSW). The notice must set out the grounds of opposition. Once filed, the Court will not proceed with the grant without notice to the opponent. Like caveats in NSW, a Notice of Intention to Oppose is a serious procedural step that should not be taken without legal advice. An opponent who proceeds without proper grounds risks an adverse costs order.
QLD estate and probate services
Challenging a Will in QLD
Grounds under QLD law: undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity, fraud, forgery, and suspicious circumstances. Supreme Court of Queensland procedure. Criminal Code s 488 implications for forged wills.
QLD will challenges →Defective Execution & s 18
Wills that fail formal execution requirements — including the s 10(2) signature position rule — may be saved by the s 18 dispensing power. Applications require strong evidence of testamentary intention.
s 18 dispensing applications →Lost Will & s 24 Presumption
If a will cannot be found after death, the s 24(2) presumption of revocation may apply. Rebutting the presumption requires evidence that the testator did not intend to revoke the will.
Lost will disputes →Executor Removal & Misconduct
Supreme Court applications to remove or pass over an executor in Queensland. Delay, self-dealing, conflict of interest, and failure to account are common grounds.
Executor removal QLD →EPOA Abuse & QCAT
Review of enduring powers of attorney by QCAT. Suspension or revocation of an attorney for misuse. Public Guardian investigations. Intersection with estate disputes.
QCAT EPOA review →Notice of Intention to Oppose
Filing and responding to Notices of Intention to Oppose a grant of probate or administration. Grounds, procedure, and costs risks in the Queensland Supreme Court.
Opposing a grant →Pathways for your role in a QLD estate
Executors
Your duties under the Succession Act 1981 (QLD) include: identifying and securing assets, applying for probate, notifying beneficiaries, paying debts, and distributing the estate. An executor who distributes prematurely or without proper inquiries may be personally liable. If a Notice of Intention to Oppose is filed, you must address it before the grant can proceed.
QLD Executor Guide →Beneficiaries
Your rights to information about the estate administration, to inspect accounts, and to seek court orders if an executor fails to proceed. If you are an eligible person who has not received adequate provision, a family provision application may be available in the Supreme Court of Queensland.
QLD Beneficiary Rights →Family Members & Supporters
If you are concerned about an elderly relative being pressured into will changes, isolation, or misuse of an enduring power of attorney, QLD law provides protective pathways. QCAT can review attorney conduct. The Public Guardian can investigate allegations of exploitation.
QLD Family Resources →Queensland estate dispute process
Examine the Will
Check execution compliance (s 10 signature position), identify any formal defects, and assess whether s 18 dispensing power may be needed.
File Notice (if opposing)
If opposing a grant, file a Notice of Intention to Oppose in the Supreme Court registry setting out your grounds of objection.
Gather Evidence
Obtain medical records, solicitor notes, witness accounts, and financial records. For lost will cases, build evidence to rebut or support the s 24 presumption.
Consider QCAT / Public Guardian
If EPOA misuse is involved, consider a parallel QCAT application or report to the Public Guardian for investigation.
Court Proceedings
File proceedings in the Supreme Court of Queensland. Many disputes resolve through mediation before reaching a solemn form trial.
Note: In Queensland, there is no formal six-month probate expectation as in NSW, but delay should still be explained. Family provision applications in QLD carry their own time limits. A Notice of Intention to Oppose should be filed as soon as concerns arise — before a grant is made. The s 10(2) positional signature requirement means that even apparently signed wills can be defective if the signature is not at the foot or end of the document.
Need advice on a Queensland estate matter?
Queensland succession law has unique features that can determine the outcome of an estate dispute. Whether you are concerned about a will's execution under s 10(2), a lost will under s 24, EPOA misuse, or suspect testamentary forgery under s 488 of the Criminal Code — early advice is essential.
Frequently asked questions — QLD estate disputes
Section 10(2) of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD) requires that the testator's signature — or the signature of the person signing at the testator's direction — must be placed at the foot or end of the will for the will to be validly executed. This is a stricter requirement than in many other Australian jurisdictions. A will where the signature appears in the margin, on a separate page without sufficient proximity to the dispositive provisions, or otherwise in a position that cannot be said to be "at the foot or end" may be invalid on its face. If a will is defective under s 10(2), the propounder may apply under s 18 for the Court to dispense with the formal requirement and admit the document to probate if it is satisfied the document expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions.
Under s 24(2) of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD), where a will was last traced to the possession of the testator and cannot be found after death, there is a presumption that the testator destroyed the will with intent to revoke it. This means that if the original will was in the testator's custody and is now missing, the starting position is that the will has been revoked and the estate passes under any earlier will or on intestacy. This presumption can be rebutted by evidence. Relevant factors include: whether the testator had capacity at the time the will went missing, whether the testator made statements consistent with the missing will remaining in force, whether any other person had access to the will, the testator's character and habits regarding document preservation, and whether there is any other plausible explanation for the will's disappearance. The strength of the presumption depends on the circumstances.
Section 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (QLD) gives the Supreme Court power to admit to probate a document that does not comply with the formal requirements for execution of a will, if the Court is satisfied that the document expresses the testamentary intentions of the deceased and that the deceased intended the document to constitute their will. This dispensing power is discretionary. It can be used to save wills with defective execution under s 10(2) (signature not at the foot or end), wills that were not properly witnessed, unsigned documents, and even digital or informal documents in some cases. The applicant must satisfy the Court on the balance of probabilities: first, that there is a document; second, that the document purports to state the deceased's testamentary intentions; and third, that the deceased intended the document to be their will. Evidence typically required includes the circumstances of preparation, statements by the deceased, and the absence of any contrary indication.
The Public Guardian (Queensland) is an independent statutory officer established under the Public Guardian Act 2014 (QLD). The Public Guardian's functions include: investigating allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of adults with impaired capacity; acting as guardian of last resort where no other suitable person is available; and applying to QCAT for orders to protect vulnerable adults. In the context of estate disputes, the Public Guardian may investigate where an elderly person is being pressured to change their will, where an attorney under an enduring power of attorney is suspected of misusing funds, or where a vulnerable adult is being isolated from family. The Public Guardian can report findings, make recommendations, and seek orders from QCAT. Concerned family members can contact the Public Guardian directly to raise concerns about financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult. The Public Guardian works alongside, and does not replace, the role of private legal advisers.